-timeless-: 1 of reasons to have 1 clan per castle is so every clan active has opportunity to have a castle. The people saying that a clan can be strong enough to hold more than 1 can not be applied when members from opposing clans protect castles not their own.

pixie_barbie: Kill 'em ! Kill 'em all !

mightylord: when i first joined the game i mistakenly enterded the nighon castle and lost a shield there ... that gave me true knowledge of a castle .

its not something u can just walk into . ppls today think of it as a garden ....

My point is castles need the hardcore pvp back

illusionz: I agree 100% with asmo.... My only input is to voice a concern that Hardcore PvP means people will lose valuable gear to Royals and Diablo...specifically because those classes have very large advantages. I wouldn't be opposed to it......but it would definitely change the way castles are working presently.... Presently it doesn't take much to take and maintain castles. With Hardcore, it would definitely be risks.....

crystalldrag0n: Perhaps castles should be removed from pvp G2 if people want true competition? That way every1 has equal chance to level up. Every1 know the extra castle boost gives more experience per hit. Lot of players wouldn't be in high ranking if not for 2 or 3 castles.

-asmodeus-: Here is my opinion on castles- we must consider two questions about castles-
1. What do the castles stand for ? and 2 - What does the existence of castle bring in to the game?
And here's my answers - 1 . Castles are a privilege! Its a Power symbol, and gives an exp bonus.
2- Castles bring in the element of competitiveness in G1 . Also they boost the morale of players whose clan has the power to capture and HOLD castles. its a sense of pride.

existing concerns- one castle per clan . this is NOT a good idea and downright misplaced in a game that thrives on the core complex of competition. to impose ANY limit on the number of castles per clan , would be to take away the competitiveness Also, then castles will lose their importance as an element of pride for the clans. IF all clans can keep one castle each, what determines which clan is more powerful ? certainly six different clans cannot be equally powerful. equality in a platform of competition, is a counter-productive illusion. We must promote competition, not oppose it.
concern 2- the weaker clans suffer - there is a very simple solution to this- GET STRONGER. it should serve as motivation to achieve such goals - become more powerful, enough to beat the current ruling clans, and seize their castles and hold them succcesfully...until another clan becomes powerful enough to overthrow even this.. THIS is healthy competition- a thriving force that fuels competitive players to better themselves more and more. Castle seizes/defenses/ overthrowings/ sabotages/etc all are necessary for dynamic gameplay, and such things will happen ONLY if limitations are not imposed.

concern 3 - castle guards in pvp server , giving exp. this should be adjusted - castle guards in any server should not give any exp .
concern 4 - Hardcore PVP in castles needs to be restored. Yes i agree to this , it should be restored. makes Castles more valuable and risky - thus making it necessary for clans to really plan ahead and coordinate for castle captures/seizes etc. making things more exciting. i strongly beleive , hardcore PVP needs restoration inside castles.

concern 5- everyone deserves benefit of castle. - Definitely a BIG NO for this. everyone donot 'deserve' it. as i mentioned above, its a privilege, the strong/powerful clans should have. you want to enjoy it, - become powerful. Bring your own game UP, instead of asking for the game to be brought down to you!

thanks.