kingdomcome: i think quest shud be set 1-10, 11-20, 21-30, and so forth its really no fair for 80's competen against 90's or watever range bracket u wanna use...my opinoin but rings true
11-10-13 16:14
lightning: I do a lot of quests and i would say that about 75 % are rank 0 or 1 . Its more a matter of me running around black dragon for 3 or 4 hours a night that get me that many not my lvl .
11-10-14 07:34
bahamut: between lvl40-60 all quests i come across are rank 8+ its because no ones capable of killing the damn things so all the rank 0-3 quests get wiped out and eventually replaced with 8+ ranked quests.. to kill them things takes a lot of potions and overall gives less xp than a scorpicore because you only get the kill xp..
11-10-14 16:13
project_d: I think he's means that there should be quest for level 1-10, then quest for level 11-20 and so on. I disagree, I think 20 levels is fine.
11-10-17 23:39
bahamut: the brackets are fine.. but a 20min counter on each quest mob would be great... you see an ace rank quest can sit for a month untouched because there stuipidly over powered.. this causes build up of high lvl quests.. a 20min timer on each qm would be ideal.. if its not killed it would be replaced with another random ranked monster..
11-10-18 13:23
teeta: A 20 minute counter is far too short. Maybe 6 hours or 12 hours or even 24 hours. What you propose with a 20 minute counter will make quest monsters too easy. There should be hard to kill monsters in this game, we just need more balance. The reward for killing a rank 8-10 quest monster should be better than for lower ranking quest monsters. That way, people won't avoid them and go after the lower ranking ones. Wouldn't you hunt the ones that reward you the best? I know that I would.
11-10-19 21:30
Page: 1/2
1 2
1 2