clash: Like I said on off pvp button was tried and failed. And again this game was design and was pvp. So no pvp was forced on us. Not pvp forced on you. There are a lot of players that will remain nuetral just to kill the attackers I am one of them. Here we go bet you like this idea no pvp what so ever in the game make mobs so weak you kill them just looking at them now that would be a great update wouldn't it you could keep you pacifier in your mouth and stay coulded up in you security blanket

clash: I'm done with it. Hopefully dreamer does make it pvp. No gear loss in common area just castles and arenas.

bianca: Vote no

oenamaus: Clash you don't make sense.. If there was an option then EVERYONE who likes pvp including the players that left can play full pvp and your old friends will return and they can also play full pvp.. Now EVERYONE who doesn't like pvp can turn pvp off and they can hunt peacfully without having to be ported back to the nearest village all the time and if they don't like pvp why should they be forced into it when it will make players leave.. So option.. Turn ON if you like pvp turn OFF if you don't like pvp and then EVERYONE is happy and NO-ONE can complain because EVERYONE gets to play bd exactly how they want to

teeta: The PKers don't want optional PVP. They want to force PVP on everyone. Who would they prey on except each other, if PVP is optional?

clash: They not being forced into nothing why can't you understand that. The no pvp was forced on us. Teeta has been here as long as I have she knows this. Bd even in its beggining stages was PVP. With what dreamer propses. A nuetral and attacker on your profile the attacker is at a disadvantage if he attacks a nuetral he becomes free game meaning if he a lvl 40 a lvl 90 nuetral can plaster him. People will think twice before attackin