dempol: It's a no for me too. I love S2 for its hardcore feature, but you may call it survival of the fittest.

Countries that aint supported with sms credits must work hard really hard to get better gears.

S1 is no s2, when servers merge I am looking forward to see how S1 works ajaja.

Hence, let's just leave S1 for what it is.

lordajie: I think this game need new features at s1... Like, if someone trying attack you, u will get message.. In that message, u can accept that attack or reject it... So, if your enemy too strong u can reject it... But, pvp like this is hardcore...

shido: no to me too.
I was registered on s2 5days ago on the day of start of s2..and my start of playing i was enjoyed bcoz i got the item stamina potion and i sell it and of course i have money and bought my items but while im in the map someone attacked me and got my items and gold too.im very disappointed bcoz of that.thats why i abandoned my account on s2 and im stick to play on s1.

vendetta: Server 1 was pvp in the map before. That was the whole reason server 2 was created. To make a peaceful safe place on server 1 for those who chose it and a hardcore pvp for those who wanted it in server 2.

jecht75: Sorry if i upset anyone but i see it as this...majority of bd players chose to play s1. Pvp should remain for arenas and castles of course just as it is in s1. As for the very few ppl that want hardcore pvp everywhere and castles saying that is the incentive of castles...the incentive of castles and fighting for them is the exp boost for having castles. Should have it the same way as it is currently in s1...is fair towards all players despite what gear they possess.

dragndagkilla: yep, people like earning there gear more than one way, pvp will just enforce to earn one way, as u would keep losing gear otherwise, people struggling wont have anything to turn too if choices u make are risky/all maps being pvp