nightshadows: Wow i hate i missed all the drama this past round

-ghostlykillerz-: Tyvm That was needed for shutting some people's mouth.
... And after seeing dragon_king's comment I am updating it... If a previously owned Diablo is not strong enough to beat a normal player then they doesn't deserve a royal Diablo in any ways

Timeless's logic is flawed to the hell.....In which world killing Royal Dragon saves credit? Royal dragon takes almost 5 times the credit than it takes to kill the BD....Problem is I got the Diablo in this way and not any of her clanmate...If it was her clanmate she would have said " Oh great,Everything is justified" But because I'm not in her pocket and I don't overlook her faults ,she will be crying about this for eternity...Even after Dreamer himself clarified everything....Shame on such hypocrite personality

-ewbank-: U remember -continue- ? :O

-continue-: Euphi 😍😍

-dragon-king1: Every round up to now had a diablo who was able to kill royal even up to the previous round , you say the system make sense but look statistic almost every round had a player who can kill royal that is either current diablo winner or a diablo class already ,listen to the voice of the players

gigolo_loco: In law school, I was taught that there are rules. You look at a fact pattern and apply the rule to that fact pattern. The rule is always right and you always follow the rule.

Except when you don’t.

For every rule, there is an exception. So you always follow the rule, except when there is an exception, in which case you follow a new rule based on that exception. Following this pattern always guarantees that you come to the right decision.

Except when it doesn’t.

There are exceptions to every exception. So the rule is always right, unless there is an exception to that rule, in which case you take the course of action prescribed by the exception, unless there is an exception to that exception, in which case, you follow the course of action prescribed by the exception to the exception.

This is how the law works. You look at the fact patterns to discover the rules. Then you look for exceptions, things that would make it so the rule doesn’t apply and where some other rule might produce a better result.

Rule Number 1 --
Dreamer is always right.

Rule Number 2 --
If Dreamer is not right, refer to rule number 1.