hexxaus: Royal Dragon only for diablo player if you (old player) still complain about this .. smh
better you log out & sleep
*for next round my idea is lock Royal Dragon for diablo only no one can attack it axcept diablo
better you log out & sleep
*for next round my idea is lock Royal Dragon for diablo only no one can attack it axcept diablo
18-08-26 04:44
dreamer: There are serious reasons why Royal Dragon CANNOT be reserved for former Diablos only:
- What if no Diablos show up to compete? A never ending round?
- What if Diablos make agreements between themselves who takes the Royal Dragon in which round?
The way the system works now makes much more sense - it's just *more* rewarding for former Diablos to kill the Royal Dragon as this upgrades their class to a Royal Diablo.
- What if no Diablos show up to compete? A never ending round?
- What if Diablos make agreements between themselves who takes the Royal Dragon in which round?
The way the system works now makes much more sense - it's just *more* rewarding for former Diablos to kill the Royal Dragon as this upgrades their class to a Royal Diablo.
18-08-26 07:46
rust_dragon: - What if no Diablos show up to compete? A never ending round?
Theres still a player who can kill both of them bd and rd on that round lol
Theres still a player who can kill both of them bd and rd on that round lol
18-08-26 08:54
gigolo_loco: In law school, I was taught that there are rules. You look at a fact pattern and apply the rule to that fact pattern. The rule is always right and you always follow the rule.
Except when you don’t.
For every rule, there is an exception. So you always follow the rule, except when there is an exception, in which case you follow a new rule based on that exception. Following this pattern always guarantees that you come to the right decision.
Except when it doesn’t.
There are exceptions to every exception. So the rule is always right, unless there is an exception to that rule, in which case you take the course of action prescribed by the exception, unless there is an exception to that exception, in which case, you follow the course of action prescribed by the exception to the exception.
This is how the law works. You look at the fact patterns to discover the rules. Then you look for exceptions, things that would make it so the rule doesn’t apply and where some other rule might produce a better result.
Rule Number 1 --
Dreamer is always right.
Rule Number 2 --
If Dreamer is not right, refer to rule number 1.
Except when you don’t.
For every rule, there is an exception. So you always follow the rule, except when there is an exception, in which case you follow a new rule based on that exception. Following this pattern always guarantees that you come to the right decision.
Except when it doesn’t.
There are exceptions to every exception. So the rule is always right, unless there is an exception to that rule, in which case you take the course of action prescribed by the exception, unless there is an exception to that exception, in which case, you follow the course of action prescribed by the exception to the exception.
This is how the law works. You look at the fact patterns to discover the rules. Then you look for exceptions, things that would make it so the rule doesn’t apply and where some other rule might produce a better result.
Rule Number 1 --
Dreamer is always right.
Rule Number 2 --
If Dreamer is not right, refer to rule number 1.
18-08-26 09:47